Icons
Icon of the month:The F word
Huw Spanner
Here is a mystery: a word that is in every sense common, which yet
has retained its power to affront for over 500 years. The
dictionaries, which from 1795 until 1965 generally declined to
include it, can record its offensiveness but cannot explain it. Its
curious quality is apparent if you substitute for it any of the 32
literal synonyms listed in Roget’s Thesaurus. Tell someone to
‘copulate off’ and you will generate only amusement. Certainly, no
one will get the hump.
Some of its impact, of course, is derived from its expressive
combination of a short vowel between a fricative ‘f’ and a plosive
‘k’. A less percussive sound might never have achieved its
pre-eminence as the most frowned-upon word in the
world.
Then again, there are plenty of similar words, from ‘cack’ to
‘pig’, which have little or no such effect. Even sexual terms that
are violent in meaning and not just in sound go off (one might say)
with less of a bang.
So precise is the phonetic chemistry that Father Ted could say
‘feck’ as much as he liked and somehow never turn the air blue. And
other nearly-but-not-quite phrases such as ‘hacked off’ or ‘muck
up’ seem only innocent or (if the euphemism is detected) a bit
limp.
The F word has become, in the proper sense of the term, a fetish: a
construct in which we have chosen to invest some mystical energy.
It isn’t the sound per se that delivers the charge, but the fact
that our culture has declared it unspeakable. Its capacity to shock
lies in our will to be shocked.
And not only the sound: the very combination of letters is
similarly taboo. We can cope with the ellipses ‘f***’ and ‘f-‘ on
the page, though they represent unequivocally exactly the same word
as the letters ‘fuck’. Yet even printed thus, without context or
feeling, it has the power to provoke us.
Even an anagram can excite us, as French Connection UK famously
found with its knowing acronym. Even an initial makes TFI Friday
look cool.
Such status does this modern tetragrammaton enjoy that it has
established an all but exclusive right to the term ‘four-letter
word’, though most of the vocabulary we use every day is four
letters long – including some of our best Anglo-Saxon, such as
‘life’, ‘love’ and ‘hope’.
Not that the F word is Anglo-Saxon at all. It was probably imported
from Germany or Holland, from a loose group of words suggesting ‘to
strike’ or ‘to thrust’. No use of it is recorded before 1475 –
maybe because it was considered too rude in the Middle Ages to
write down. No one knows why it should have been singled out for
this special dishonour. Shakespeare toys with it in several plays,
but never as boldly as the C word in Hamlet III.ii.
D H Lawrence attempted to reclaim it in 1928 as a good, earthy,
impolite word for a good, earthy, impolite act, with limited
success; but the edge it retained has since been dulled by
over-use. Its residual force is exploited to diminishing effect by
would-be rebels and comics and scriptwriters looking for a short
cut to
verité.
In a postmodern culture, such a monolithic taboo is anyway hard to
sustain. In different circles, the F word has very different
values. For many, it is hardly more than a mild intensifier, though
little boys still consider it daring. Billy Connolly uses it merely
as sonic punctuation.
For some, it remains an ‘obscenity’, a source of more outrage than
the arms trade or Third World debt. But small transgressions were
always a useful distraction from bigger ones. One wonders, to be
honest, whether God gives a fig. n
This icon first appeared in the November 2000 issue of Third Way.
It is also available in our online archive, which goes back
to the magazine’s first issue in 1977.
Here is a mystery: a word that is in every sense common, which
yet has retained its power to affront for over 500 years. The
dictionaries, which from 1795 until 1965 generally declined to
include it, can record its offensiveness but cannot explain it. Its
curious quality is apparent if you substitute for it any of the 32
literal synonyms listed in Roget’s Thesaurus. Tell someone
to ‘copulate off’ and you will generate only amusement. Certainly,
no one will get the hump.
Some of its impact, of course, is derived from its expressive
combination of a short vowel between a fricative ‘f’ and a plosive
‘k’. A less percussive sound might never have achieved its
pre-eminence as the most frowned-upon word in the world.
Then again, there are plenty of similar words, from ‘cack’ to
‘pig’, which have little or no such effect. Even sexual terms that
are violent in meaning and not just in sound go off (one might say)
with less of a bang.
So precise is the phonetic chemistry that Father Ted could say
‘feck’ as much as he liked and somehow never turn the air blue. And
other nearly-but-not-quite phrases such as ‘hacked off’ or ‘muck
up’ seem only innocent or (if the euphemism is detected) a bit
limp.
The F word has become, in the proper sense of the term, a
fetish: a construct in which we have chosen to invest some mystical
energy. It isn’t the sound per se that delivers the charge, but the
fact that our culture has declared it unspeakable. Its capacity to
shock lies in our will to be shocked.
And not only the sound: the very combination of letters is
similarly taboo. We can cope with the ellipses ‘f***’ and ‘f-‘ on
the page, though they represent unequivocally exactly the same word
as the letters ‘fuck’. Yet even printed thus, without context or
feeling, it has the power to provoke us.
Even an anagram can excite us, as French Connection UK famously
found with its knowing acronym. Even an initial makes TFI Friday
look cool.
Such status does this modern tetragrammaton enjoy that it has
established an all but exclusive right to the term ‘four-letter
word’, though most of the vocabulary we use every day is four
letters long – including some of our best Anglo-Saxon, such as
‘life’, ‘love’ and ‘hope’.
Not that the F word is Anglo-Saxon at all. It was probably
imported from Germany or Holland, from a loose group of words
suggesting ‘to strike’ or ‘to thrust’. No use of it is recorded
before 1475 – maybe because it was considered too rude in the
Middle Ages to write down. No one knows why it should have been
singled out for this special dishonour. Shakespeare toys with it in
several plays, but never as boldly as the C word in Hamlet
III.ii.
D H Lawrence attempted to reclaim it in 1928 as a good, earthy,
impolite word for a good, earthy, impolite act, with limited
success; but the edge it retained has since been dulled by
over-use. Its residual force is exploited to diminishing effect by
would-be rebels and comics and scriptwriters looking for a short
cut to verité.
In a postmodern culture, such a monolithic taboo is anyway hard
to sustain. In different circles, the F word has very different
values. For many, it is hardly more than a mild intensifier, though
little boys still consider it daring. Billy Connolly uses it merely
as sonic punctuation.
For some, it remains an ‘obscenity’, a source of more outrage
than the arms trade or Third World debt. But small transgressions
were always a useful distraction from bigger ones. One wonders, to
be honest, whether God gives a fig.